Ποικιλια η "αυτοαντιγραφη";

Πολλοι συγγραφεις-πετυχημενοι-εχουν ενα ειδος γραφης,μια θεματολογια,ανηκουν σε ενα genre βρε αδερφε και ειναι πιστοι σε αυτο.Δεν παρεκλινουν.Αντιθετα γραφουν πανω κατω τα ιδια πραγματα που τους εκαναν-ισως-πετυχημενους.Εσεις το κανετε αυτο;
Δειτε τι λεει σχετικα ο Μουρκοκ:
I DO write for the love of it, but I make the books increasingly ambitious because I don't want them to become boring. I work on the assumption if I'm bored then the reader will be too. This is a slightly erroneous assumption, as it happens, but I go on making it nonetheless. Many readers ask me for books like the simpler earlier Elric books, for instance, and find the later ones less enjoyable. My answer to that is that I CAN'T simply go on imitating myself the way some authors seem to be able to. I need to set myself harder tasks. Occasionally, as in a graphic novel or a short story, I'll let myself have a bit of fun (as with the new Elric comic) but that's because the form itself is not that of the novel. I'm rather puritanical about trying to give readers value for money. It would be very easy to crank out dozens of S&S tales all following the same lines of the first but I can't do it. That's also why I have done no new Corum books, in spite of many readers demanding them. I just don't have any new Corum stories in me and it would be dishonest, in my view, to do some just for the money. One day, maybe, I'll have an idea which will suit Corum, but until then I've drawn a line under his stories. I am fairly contemtuous of writers who just go on turning out the same story year after year for the 'market'
Αλλα και μια αποψη ενος τριτου για τον ιδιο τον Μουρκοκ:
When I look at Mike's output (who's pretty much the only fantasy author I read apart from T*lk*in) I see such diverse works as 'The Shores of Death' (SF), 'Stormbringer' (Fantasy), 'The Chinese Agent' (comedy), the Cornelius novels (political satire?), 'Gloriana' (romance), 'The War Lord of the Air' (steampunk?), 'The Dancers at the End of Time' (fin de siecle), the Pyat novels (historical), 'Mother London' (social)... The list of different 'genres' that Mike uses varies quite considerably. Which is what I expect from a 'proper author'. If I don't 'get' Mike's latest novel it doesn't matter because there'll be something different out next year that might be more to my tastes.
Λοιπον,τι προτιματε;Και τι εχετε να πειτε για τους συγγραφεις που μπαινουν σε ενα λουκι η για αυτους που προσπαθουν να κανουν και κατι αλλο;Εμενα πολλοι μου θυμιζουν ατομα απο το χωρο της μουσικης και της τηλεορασης που κανουν τα ιδια πραγματα αλλαζοντας τα λιγο και λανσαροντας τα ως καινουργια.
Προσφατο παραδειγμα αυτο των Ρεππα-Παπαθανασιου που αντεγραψαν ΔΙΚΟ τους επεισοδιο στο Safe Sex(ενα απο τις Τρεις Χαριτες).
Εγω προσπαθω στα λιγα διηγηματα που γραφω να εχω διαφορετικα θεματα και στυλ.
Διαολε,μολις τελειωσα το "Αρκτικος κυκλος" και ειδα τον Μπραουν να επαναλαμβανεται ξανα και ξανα!Και ειναι ισως ο πιο εμπορικος συγγραφεας μετα τη Ροουλινγκ!